Drugs before sex more common in UK than in Europe or US – study – The Guardian


UK citizens are more likely than Europeans or those living in the US to have taken drugs such as MDMA and cocaine before sex during the last year, according to a new study. Researchers used data from the Global Drug Survey of roughly 22,000 people to find that 64% (4,719) of people surveyed from the UK had had sex having drunk alcohol, compared with 60% (1,296) from Europe and 55% (2064) from the US. Of those who took part in the study, the number who combined sex and cocaine was 13% from the UK (936) compared to 8% from Europe. Similarly, a higher number said they had had sex after MDMA, with 20% of those who participated in the survey from the UK saying they had done so against 15% from the US and Europe. The study’s lead author, Dr Will Lawn, noted that because the study was self-selecting, the proportion in the overall population was likely to be lower. The drugs most commonly used during sex across all countries were alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine, while GHB – which has been linked to chemsex parties, where participants take drugs with the specific aim of having sex afterwards – and MDMA were viewed as having the most significant effect on sexual experience. The findings were put together by academics at the University College London and the Global Drug Survey team and published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine. They drew from a survey where people responded to online questions about which drugs they used when having sex, as well as how drugs affected their sexual experience. “To my knowledge no one has ever investigated country-related difference in how drugs are combined with sex, and this shows the UK may well be at greater risk of chemsex-related harm than other countries, something our country has to be mindful of,” said Dr Lawn. The British Medical Journal has called chemsex a “public health timebomb” because of the associated prevalence of risky sex. Lawn also noted that some drugs would be more popular in certain countries, leading to differences. “For a drug like mephedrone, there was a strong difference between the UK and the Eurozone because [the drug] was particularly popular in the UK but not so much other parts of the world,” he said. He said cannabis was more commonly used in the US in general and this correlated with a higher number of people using it during sex. Cannabis was the only drug in which the UK did not top the US and other countries, with 49% of people from the states combining it with sex compared with 36% in the UK. Lawn said that “differences between groups did emerge” in the study. Men who identified as homosexual were roughly 1.6 times more likely than heterosexual men to take drugs with the intention of enhancing their sexual experiences. They confirmed that GHB/GBL, mephedrone and methamphetamine are more commonly combined with sex by homosexual men than heterosexual men. Lawn said: “In summary, the overall message is that men and women of homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual orientation all use drugs with sex. We should not isolate that behaviour as something only men who have sex with men do, which is the stereotypical chemsex image. However, harm reduction messages about certain drugs should still be targeted at specific drugs to specific groups, given that the combination of sex with GHB/GBL, mephedrone and methamphetamine is more popular among gay men.” Professor Adam Winstock, the founder and director of the Global Drug Survey and a senior author, said: “Our study is by far the largest to date to investigate the relationships between sex and drugs. Previous studies have rarely compared men and women, and people of different sexual orientations. “Furthermore, by appreciating how different drugs affect sex we can tailor our harm reduction messages. These pragmatic messages can save lives.”
%%item_Soucre_Link_button%%

Colon and rectal cancer can amble disregarded in younger adults, gaze reveals – CNN


(CNN)Kim Newcomer became once a licensed about colon cancer; her father became once identified with the disease at age 46, she acknowledged. So after strolling again from a day out to the Dominican Republic in 2008, when she complained of constipation to her valuable care physician, she became once stunned that her physician despatched her home with laxatives in notify of attempting out her for the cancer.

“I spent the following few months accurate going to the physician, attempting to secure a diagnosis. In the first four months, I potentially seen six assorted doctors,” Newcomer acknowledged. “They couldn’t obtain anything else inappropriate with me even supposing I wired that I had a family historical previous of colorectal cancer. They idea I became once accurate too young for it.”
In the months following, Newcomer acknowledged, she developed a continual cough and underwent a chest x-ray. The x-ray published lesions in her lungs and one breast.
As soon as the tumors in her breast and lungs were biopsied and analyzed, doctors confirmed what Newcomer had suspected all alongside.
“Eleven months after I had first complained of symptoms, I became once identified with stage-4 colorectal cancer,” Newcomer acknowledged. She became once 35 at the time.
Newcomer’s preliminary misdiagnosis demonstrates a rising voice among younger colorectal cancer patients, in step with look at to be presented at the American Affiliation for Cancer Study’s annual assembly in Atlanta on Tuesday.

‘It be an lost sight of population because they’re younger’

The look at surveyed 1,195 colorectal cancer patients and survivors ages 20 to 49, largely from the United States. Newcomer became once one of them.
The look at came upon that most of gaze respondents, 57%, were identified between the ages of 40 and 49; a Third were identified between the ages of 30 and 39; about 10% were identified sooner than age 30.
Even supposing most colorectal cancer patients older than 50 are identified within the early phases of disease, the contemporary look at published that most of the younger patients and survivors within the gaze, 71%, acknowledged they were identified at the evolved phases of three and 4.
That finding suggests that and not utilizing a screening and consciousness of the opportunity of colorectal cancer at these ages, indicators of their cancer could also contain long gone disregarded in its early phases.
The gaze responses moreover confirmed that most of the patients and survivors, 63%, waited three to one year sooner than visiting their doctors for symptoms, because they did no longer acknowledge their symptoms as cancer-associated.
Additionally, 67% of the respondents acknowledged they seen a minimum of two physicians sooner than being identified precisely with colorectal cancer, which entails every colon and rectal cancers.
“It be an lost sight of population because they’re younger and on the total are usually wholesome,” acknowledged Dr. Ronit Yarden, lead author of the look at and director of clinical affairs at the nonprofit Colorectal Cancer Alliance, a patient advocacy group in Washington.
“It be most essential that of us know the symptoms,” she acknowledged.
Limitations of the look at incorporated that the gaze responses were self-reported, and extra look at is wanted to search out out whether identical findings would emerge among a greater sample of patients in contrast with older patients.
“It be mute a rare thing for younger folks to secure colon cancer,” acknowledged Dr. Paul Oberstein, a clinical oncologist and director of the Gastrointestinal Scientific Oncology Program at NYU Langone’s Perlmutter Cancer Middle in Fresh York, who became once no longer fascinated concerning the contemporary look at.
“Nonetheless it indubitably does happen, and I mediate for folks who contain indicators of it — constipation, rectal bleeding or pains going to the loo — they need to secure evaluated for cancer, among other conditions,” he acknowledged.

Colorectal cancer symptoms and screening pointers

Signs of colorectal cancer encompass diarrhea or constipation; feeling that your bowel does no longer empty fully; blood to your stool; frequent gasoline agonize or cramps; weight reduction and not utilizing a identified reason; fatigue, and nausea or vomiting.
The American Cancer Society as a lot as this level its colorectal cancer screening pointers closing year to suggest that adults at realistic risk secure screened starting at age forty five in notify of fifty, as previously told. Screening choices can range from getting a extremely easy fecal take a look at every year to undergoing colonoscopy every 10 years.
These at elevated risk encompass African American citizens, Alaska Natives and folks with a family historical previous or a private historical previous of colon or rectal polyps; such risk components can also require screening at an earlier age.
“What’s in actuality main is that of us who contain a family historical previous of colon cancer — being any first-stage relative who had colon cancer at any age — that particular person need to secure screened at age 40 or 10 years sooner than the family member’s diagnosis,” acknowledged Oberstein, who became once no longer fascinated concerning the pointers.
“So in case your father had it at forty five, secure screened at 35,” she acknowledged.
The as a lot as this level pointers, published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, acknowledged that realistic-risk adults in factual well being with a life expectancy of greater than 10 years need to continue colorectal cancer screening by the age of 75.
Colorectal cancer is the third most overall reason within the wait on of cancer-associated deaths globally, in step with the World Health Organization.
In the United States, colorectal cancer is the 2nd-main reason within the wait on of cancer-associated deaths among cancers which contain an tag on every men and women folks, in step with the Centers for Disease Administration and Prevention.
Old look at contain suggested that rates of colorectal cancer deaths are rock climbing among adults younger than 55 within the United States.

An ‘uptick’ of colon cancer in younger adults

After declining total from 1970 to 2004, colon and rectal cancer mortality rates among 20- to 54-year-olds within the United States elevated by 1% every year from 2004 to 2014, in step with a 2017 gaze within the clinical journal JAMA.
As for Newcomer, by 2012, she now no longer confirmed proof of disease and has been a cancer survivor ever since, but she acknowledged that her myth can also wait on lift consciousness about how colorectal cancer without concerns can amble lost sight of in younger adults.
“I mute contain prolonged-length of time effects. So I in actuality contain a laborious time walking; I in actuality contain a laborious time with neuropathy with my hands and feet. I in actuality contain zero sexual characteristic for this reason of radiation and chemotherapy treatments,” acknowledged Newcomer, now forty five and living in Arizona, who runs the By no components Too Young outreach program at the Colorectal Cancer Alliance.
“It be so main to secure this recordsdata out to other patients and survivors,” she acknowledged. “The higher voice is, how carry out we educate kids and clinical mavens on the amplify of young-onset colorectal cancer?”
Whereas colorectal cancer stays exceptional extra overall after age 50, “we are seeing an uptick of younger folks being identified with colon cancer,” acknowledged Dr. Nilofer Azad, partner professor of oncology at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Middle in Baltimore and a member of the Stand Up to Cancer Colorectal Cancer Dream Team, who became once no longer fascinated concerning the contemporary look at.
Specifically, colon cancer incidence rates elevated by 1% to 2.4% every year since the mid-Eighties in adults 20 to 39 and by 0.5% to 1.3% since the mid-Nineties in adults 40 to 54, in step with a gaze published within the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 2017.
Though these incidence rates in younger adults mute live little, the gaze came upon that for this reason, any individual born circa 1990 would now contain double the probability of colon cancer and quadruple the probability of rectal cancer at the identical age than within the event that they been born circa 1950.

‘It be continually factual to be an recommend for yourself’

Anecdotally, Azad acknowledged, she has seen extra colorectal cancer patients below the age of fifty — including in their 20s and 30s — all around the previous couple of years, whereas that became once very atypical sooner than.
“Nonetheless that’s no longer true recordsdata. It be one physician’s ride, and I work in a greater heart where folks reach to look out 2nd and third opinions,” Azad acknowledged.
On the total, when colorectal cancer symptoms emerge in younger adults, a physician can also refer that patient to other doctors to secure assorted opinions.
“Whereas you happen to are feeling shy about something and your physician is no longer shy but your symptoms continue, or no longer it’s continually realistic to secure a 2nd idea. … It be continually factual to be an recommend for yourself,” Azad acknowledged.
“Whereas you happen to could also contain symptoms that are in line with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, you desires to be evaluated the identical components an particular particular person would be evaluated within the event that they were 30 years older,” she acknowledged. “The default desires to be to rule out severe conditions, including cancer, in notify of making assumptions that something is no longer cancer or benign.”

Read More